Remember last February, when Jojo Ruba’s talk “Echoes of the Holocaust” was shut down by spineless officials at St. Mary’s University after a handful of student fascists shouted him down for the better part of an hour?
It is starting to look like the pro-abortion damage-control apparatus is gearing up for Jojo’s upcoming talk at McGill University in Montreal, where the pro-life club Choose Life McGill will be hosting Jojo on October 6.
The Student Society of McGill University (SSMU) has recently granted Choose Life provisional club status. Basically, they are on a three-month probation during which they must hold a certain number of events and prove they are an active club, as a prerequisite to full club status being granted. This was not, naturally, well taken by the campus womyn:
Women’s Studies student Andrew Thorne, watching from the gallery, claimed Choose Life was a structurally violent group and opposed its legitimization through SSMU.
“Pro-life is inherently violent against women and against human rights,” he said of the ideological mandate of the group.
During the debates over campus pro-life clubs at Carleton three years ago, we saw the same rhetorical tactic. It is irrelevant whether any actual violence takes place or can be attributed to the activities of “pro-life”; all the womyn have to say is that opposition to abortion on demand is “inherently violent against women.” (As I’ve asked before: if talking about abortion is inherently violent, what does that make an actual abortion?)
Choose Life McGill has already held one event: the Silent No More Awareness Campaign, in which a number of women told the story of their negative experiences with abortion. Predictably, this has already been denounced as “scare tactics” by the campus feministas, who were apparently freaked out by being forced to see graphic images of women holding an “I Regret My Abortion” sign. (Time to break out the smelling salts again.) And there were protestors on site as well:
“I am deeply disturbed…that someone might walk to class and encounter signs that target a difficult decision that they had to make…. Whether they are made to feel ashamed for a minute or for the rest of the year, it’s not okay,” they said.
Arts Senator Sarah Woolf (U2 Political Science and Women’s Studies) student participated in the pro-choice protest and agreed that Choose Life’s activities, including hosting SNMAC, are offensive.
“As a woman on campus, their activities are offensive to me. Within the context of their current activities, I don’t want them on campus,” Woolf said.
We can’t have the poor dears be made to feel uncomfortable, can we? It’s ironic that the campus blackshirts should accuse Choose Life of being “manipulative”, while at the same time attempting to shame them off campus with manipulative emotional blackmail.
But never mind emotional blackmail: how about the normal kind? Last night, a motion – co-authored by the aforementioned Sarah Woolf – censuring Choose Life for scheduling Jojo’s talk was passed by the SSMU Council. Should they go ahead, apparently their eligibility for funding will be revoked. ProWomanProLife has the full text of the motion, including:
Whereas this event violates tenets of social justice, anti-oppression, and respect. . . .
Be it further resolved that the SSMU demand that the Deputy Provost (Student Life and Learning) Morton Mendelson intervene in order to cancel the event regardless of any inconvenience this will cause Jose “Jojo” Ruba or the Choose Life Club.
Yep, you have to love the way the campus blackshirts think: in the name of fighting “oppression,” call upon the power of the university administration to ausrotten an ideologically impure lecture and public assembly.
Tuesday night, assuming it goes forward, is going to be interesting.